@Fisherman,
Your very one-sided way of reading and bolding the quote shows you're not willing to be honest and understand what the writer really said. Your Watchtower is showing.
Thomson remarks: "Change over time is a fact, and descent from common ancestors is based on such unassailable [meaning undeniable] logic that we act as though it is a fact.
Biologists consider it to be a scientific fact that evolution
So your own quote shows that the evidence is so overwhelming that evolution cannot be denied, and that those who actually know the subject best consider it a fact for all intents and purposes.
And here you are trying to bend a statement that confirms the robustness of the theory of evolution into a basis on which you can deny the undeniable.
Besides that, you have artfully tried dodge the questions I submitted:
If you cannot accept evolution because it is 'not a fact' while the evidence that supports it makes those who are experts in biology consider it a fact, on what basis are you accepting Bronze age myths as fact, maybe even absolute truth?
Is the evidence (if any) that you accept for any gods' existence more compelling than the evidence that supports evolution?
Is there any evidence that your specific God exists?
Can you present that evidence please?
Can anyone consider the existence of God a fact more than evolution can be considered a fact?
BTW, please don't bother replying with more of your word soup. I really don't care about that quote, or about your tries to make words change meaning.
Unless you have a direct (and somewhat readable) answer to (one of) my questions I probably won't read your reaction.
Have a good life!